Reading the letters to the editor section of the newspaper is appealing to me. If published in a well-respected periodical, such letters can provide even more insight into an issue than the original article, as they often represent various viewpoints. So, it was with interest that I read the letters in response to the October 16, 2011 New York Times article How Medicare Fails the Elderly. The article’s premise was that costly and sometimes inappropriate, even harmful, procedures and treatments can be willingly paid for by Medicare while denying funding for what people really need.
No question these are thorny issues. They raise complex and challenging ethical concerns and often surface conflicting, emotionally laden, and/or confusing family beliefs and values. I found that the letters to the editor in response to this article echoed the philosophy of many an Alzheimer’s advocate, including the need to: Continue reading “NYT Readers expand on how medicare fails the elderly” »






